Editor’s note: This article references the article, “Cops remove protesters at midnight,” published in the Daily Lobo on Monday.
Editor,
When did UNM become no better than a banana republic, hiding behind the buzzword of “safety” and lurking behind proper permits?
Sure, Karen Wentworth can hide behind University policy as justification for the removal of the protesters, but weren’t the protesters camping out on University property the whole week before?
So I guess the policy is only enforced when the University gets tired of the protesters? How convenient. I guess I’m supposed to be soothed by this bit of “bureaucratese” and disregard the fact that UNM is selectively enforcing its own policy like some sort of banana republic. If UNM is going to hide behind policy then it should have taken action last week.
Now I’m supposed to be soothed by this quote: “Central (Avenue) is just not a safe place,” she said. Really? Central Avenue is not safe? Did it suddenly get more safe when the protesters were on the corner of Central Avenue and University Boulevard?
Finally, in what struck me as a sort of Kafkaesque moment, is this excerpt from the article: “Wentworth said protesters applied for a convention permit when they should have applied for an outdoor activities permit.” Oh my, they got the wrong paperwork?
Would they have been allowed to stay had they gotten the right paperwork?
Here’s my guess as to what happened: Protesters camped out on University and Central for what administrators hoped would only be a couple of days. It turned out that it lasted a bit longer, so the University asked if protesters would be willing to relocate from the pristine environs at University and Central to a more trodden location next to the bookstore.
The protesters relocate, and when they don’t disperse after a couple of really crappy, rainy days, the administration starts to get a bit worried.
What if the protesters just don’t go away? Haven’t we humored them long enough? Haven’t they made their point? Okay, let’s get rid of them. Let’s do it at midnight so no other students/community members see it. Let’s hide behind the monster bureaucracy we’ve created and say it’s not “safe,” and it’s not “sanitary.” Really?
So this is how much UNM supports the First Amendment? We’re here to educate and help create civil-minded citizens, but when it gets a tad bit ugly let’s just dispense with it.
Get content from The Daily Lobo delivered to your inbox
Here’s my suggestion to the University: If you support the First Amendment, but you don’t want people defecating on the lawn, put up a Port-a-Pot.
If you support the First Amendment but you don’t want a ramshackle “shanty town” to make UNM look like a third-world village, put up those nice, neat Lobo tents so the protesters can be protected from the elements.
There are numerous other ways UNM could show its support for the protesters, but as it is, it has shown that it supports the banks and the corporations, the very elements that have caused a budgetary hardship on every department at UNM. You either support the protesters or you support the banks. Whose side are you on?
Don McIver
UNM visiting faculty
