Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.
The Daily Lobo The Independent Voice of UNM since 1895
Latest Issue
Read our print edition on Issuu

COLUMN: New bill mocks academia

by Richard M. Berthold

Daily Lobo Columnist

The New Mexico State

Legislature is confirming a suspicion

I have entertained for 30

years: its only serious interest in

the University of New Mexico is

that it provide winning football

and, especially, basketball teams.

House Bill 581, sponsored by

Rep. Daniel “Dumb As Me”

Enjoy what you're reading?
Get content from The Daily Lobo delivered to your inbox
Subscribe

Foley and approved by a 61-4

vote, would lower academic standards

for “student” athletes by

requiring that N.M. schools set

admission and eligibility standards

for athletes no higher than

those of the worst school that we

compete against. Among other

things, this would lower acceptable

transfer credits for athletes

from C to D at UNM.

Foley claims we are imposing

an “unfair standard” on our athletes

by setting the bar too high,

and UNM Senior Associate

Athletic Director Conrad Colbert

agrees that our higher standards

put UNM on an “uneven playing

field.” Demonstrating his com-mitment

to higher learning, however,

Colbert hastens to add that

UNM can provide a good education

for these D students. By

UNM he presumably means the

faculty, most of whom are paid a

lot less than Colbert, which I suppose

is an indicator of the relative

importance of Senior Associate

Athletic Directors and professors.

This proposal is of course

appalling in several ways, none

of which apparently matter to

most House members. Most obvious,

the bill not only lowers academic

standards, but does so only

for a single group of students,

creating a double standard for the

university. Now, it might be

argued that for the kinds of courses

taken by many athletes in the

high-profile sports there is really

not much difference between a C

and a D, and in any case we all

know that most of these people

are not really students anyway.

True perhaps, but the double

standard still makes the university

and New Mexico look ridiculous

and inevitably cheapens any

undergraduate degree awarded by

UNM.

Second, this inane piece of legislation

is a slap in the face of

every board of regents in the

state.

Of course, as political

appointees, most regents are clueless

about what a university truly

is and many seemingly agree with

Foley that excellence equals a

winning basketball team, but they

are nevertheless the ultimate governing

body of each institution of

higher learning in New Mexico.

With this bill the state political

apparatus is once again interfer-ing

(perhaps unconstitutionally,

but this is quite fashionable since

Sept. 11) in academic affairs and

threatening the autonomy of the

university and thus its existence

as a place of intellectual freedom,

a depressingly familiar scenario

in the relationship between government

and academe.

Closer to home, Foley’s silly

bill spits in the face of the faculty,

who have by long tradition set

standards and managed purely

academic matters. On the other

hand, UNM faculty are well

accustomed to being spat upon by

just about every group in New

Mexico and have never exercised

any real power over big time athletics.

In a burst of admirable

honesty, Athletic Director Rudy

Davalos once told me that with

the politicians, regents and boosters

on his side why should he care

about the opinions of the faculty?

Why, indeed?

Well, what can you expect from

the New Mexico Legislature?

Remember, these are the same

people who are currently considering

deregulating

telecommuni-cations

so that Qwest and Valor,

who have this legislative session

given over $15,000 to the politicos,

can raise our rates.

These are the same wise men

who are resisting a measure to

ban cock fighting, describing it as

a part of New Mexico’s cultural

heritage and wholesome family

entertainment. These are the same

public servants who have so far

this session accepted a quarter of

a million dollars in favors from

sundry businesses in and out of

New Mexico. (In America politicians

call this “lobbying”; most

normal people call it “bribery.”)

What can be done? Not much,

given the voters’ penchant for

electing the same bozos year after

year. Of course all the regents in

the state could threaten to resign

as a protest, but that is hardly

likely to happen. Most regents are

businessmen, boosters and political

wannabes, who are not about

to anger the political

establishment.

Besides, Gov. Bill Richardson, who is doing a

damned convincing imitation of a

Republican, would simply accept

the resignations (already pre-signed

and on file) and appoint

more of his own hacks — if he

actually happened to be in New

Mexico at the time, that is.

The UNM faculty could threat-en

some sort of serious job action

in defense of the university’s

autonomy and their own academic

authority. Yeah, right after the

Cincinnati Bengals win a Super

Bowl.

Then again, what does it all

matter? Who cares about what is

going on here in

Unwichtigstadt-am-

Rio Grande when Chancellor

Bush and his Coalition of the

Bribed and Threatened are about

to invade Poland?

Comments
Powered by SNworks Solutions by The State News
All Content © 2025 The Daily Lobo