Migrants face hardship at every turn
This summer I looked into someone’s eyes and saw fear, honest fear.
I accompanied the UNM Cross-Border Issues Group to Mexico in July. The group, led by Communication & Journalism Professor Richard Schaefer, works primarily in Cuernavaca, Mexico, researching immigration. This year’s research led us to Oaxaca City, Ixtapec, and Acapulco.
Honduran immigrants seeking refuge in Mexico play cards in a safe house in Ixtepec, Mexico, on July 16. If their refugee status is denied, they said they plan to come to America.
Possibly related:
- Senator pulls for ethics reform · Feb 8
- Students ask for sustainable garden · Feb 8
- Question of the Week: How are you going to cope with a tuition increase? · Feb 4
- Know your rights as a renter in New Mexico · Feb 4
- Blue lights designed with safety in mind · Feb 3
The CBI group has investigated Mexican migration to the United States as well as intra-Mexican migration over the past three years. The group expanded its investigation this year to include
immigration from Central America to North America.
We worked with El Centro de Orientación del Migrante de Oaxaca (COMI), an organization based in Oaxaca, that supports migrants who leave home in search of a better future. It is here that I began to realize what immigration means to migrants.
COMI manages several safe houses that provide lodging and meals to passing migrants. In the safe houses, or albergues, migrants can learn about the rights they have and the dangers and consequences they’re up against in migrating from Central Amerca and Mexico.
“They will get a job, but they won’t be paid much,” said Fernando Cruz Montes, director of COMI. “They will be both marginalized and discriminated against. They are hit hard and suffer by being taken out of their culture and country.”
CBIG students had the opportunity to meet, interview and befriend migrants in transit. The students heard the stories of exploitation. I learned that migrants are often robbed, beaten and kidnapped as they ride freight trains they call “la bestia,” or “The Beast.”
“Migrants suffer in transit. They die on the trains, in the rivers and roads,” Cruz Montes said. “They die in the desert. And their dreams die with them.”
Cruz Montes told us migrants still face adversity even if they reach their destination.
“They arrive in a country with unfamiliar laws and getting caught puts them at a risk greater than paying a fine,” he said.
Then, when migrants return to Mexico or Central America, they have a different life perspective and have a difficult time assimilating at home, Cruz Montes said.
“People know they left to improve their lot, but they return different, without the same sense of culture, family and community,” he said. “They are egotistical. They’ve earned money or influence. Their faith changes.”
With all of these obstacles, why would anyone still try to migrate? We asked, and heard one common answer.
“My reason for leaving my land is the confrontations, political confrontations (and) also gangs confrontations, insecurity,” said Edwin, a migrant from Honduras. “And there is no employment, and if there is, the wage is too low, and basic product prices continuously go up.”
The CBIG group and I interviewed immigrants, government officials, human rights associations, experts and students to round out our research. Each student shared their findings in a presentation at the Universidad de Fray Luca Paccioli, a UNM affiliate school in Cuernavaca, Mexico, on July 30.
We will continue to work at UNM to put together multimedia pieces for an American audience.













by slowhike
Many readers may not notice that the description of this study’s subject does not indicate whether or not the immigrants are coming across legally or illegally. However, the term “safe house” would appear to lend some weight to the illegal descriptor. If that’s the case then UNM, certainly professor Schaefer and his colleagues, are all part of the larger problem of lawlessness and economic instability that plague our state and country. And whether or not one supports their efforts [and those of the “protected underground illegal immigrant railroad” in New Mexico] is immaterial when a determination of legal vs illegal is made. One cannot easily be for law and order when it comes to drinking and driving and violent crime- but then turn a blind eye to what they consider “OK” or a “law” to be ignored. This is a phenomemon in our state that apparently the mayor of Abq., the state congressmen, and the governor fully support. Otherwise funding to UNM would be in jeopardy. It’s no wonder the concept of obeying the law in NM is difficult for many, and displays the meaningless gesture of a campaign which promises to reduce crime.
by Sari Krosinsky
This was a journalism class. Ethical journalists aren’t supposed to for or against law and order (at least in their reporting). They’re supposed to report the facts without bias.
If the government were to interfere with a journalism course because the students are getting first hand interviews with people involved in a controversial issue, that would be censorship. And personally, I find illegal activity by the government more offensive than illegal activity by individuals.
by Slowhike
Perhaps some like to believe in the strategy of masquerade, and may even believe it. Government interference with class activity is not the issue, nor is there any link or reference to illegal government activity. Denial of the obvious is one definition of insanity, it’s duplicitous to say the least.